蜜桃社

Table of Contents

Students sue college president who invented rules to ban conservative flyers

Clovis

Young Americans for Freedom member Alejandro Flores is suing Clovis Community College. (Alvarez Photography Studio)

  • Public records reveal administrators schemed to justify removing flyers deemed 鈥渋nappropriate鈥 because of conservative messages
  • FIRE lawsuit challenges blatant viewpoint discrimination, seeks to hold administrators personally accountable 
  • Student: 鈥溾嬧婳ur college should encourage us to discuss and sharpen our ideas, not shut down the conversation.鈥

FRESNO, Calif., Aug. 11, 2022 鈥 Three conservative college students wanted to criticize authoritarianism. But when administrators deemed their opinions inappropriate and offensive, the students found themselves facing an oppressive regime right on campus.

Today, students from a campus chapter of Young Americans for Freedom, represented by the 蜜桃社, sued California鈥檚 Clovis Community College, delivering a simple message: Public colleges cannot ban students鈥 flyers because administrators subjectively deem their political viewpoints inappropriate or offensive. 

鈥淐lovis tried to put up barriers against our ideas because administrators didn鈥檛 like them,鈥 said YAF-Clovis founder Alejandro Flores. 鈥淏ut that鈥檚 the opposite of what a college should do. Our college should encourage us to discuss and sharpen our ideas, not shut down the conversation.鈥

In November 2021, Alejandro and fellow club members Daniel Flores and Juliette Colunga received permission from administrators to hang three flyers on bulletin boards inside Clovis鈥 academic buildings. The flyers advocated for freedom and listed the death tolls of communist regimes. 

Emails obtained via a public records request reveal that soon after the flyers went up, a Clovis administrator wrote that he would 鈥済ladly鈥 take the flyers down, following complaints about their content. The administrator also wrote that approving the flyers in the first place may have been a 鈥渕istake,鈥 and that Clovis instead should have censored them under a policy that states: 鈥淧osters with inappropriate or offense [sic] language or themes are not permitted and will not be approved.鈥 

On Nov. 12, Clovis President Lori Bennett personally ordered the flyers removed. After doing so, she searched for a reason to justify the viewpoint discrimination, inventing a brand new rule requiring flyers to double as club announcements.

鈥淚f you need a reason, you can let them know that [we] agreed they aren鈥檛 club announcements,鈥 Bennett wrote. Clovis does not have a policy on the books that requires flyers to be club announcements. But with this excuse in hand, Clovis employees told student workers to remove the flyers.

Administrators later used that pretextual justification to stop the students from hanging a new set of five pro-life flyers 鈥 which the students submitted for approval in December 鈥 on the bulletin boards inside heavily trafficked campus buildings. Instead, administrators banished the flyers to a rotting 鈥渇ree speech kiosk鈥 in a desolate part of campus. 

COURTESY PHOTOS FOR MEDIA USE

鈥淏y relegating the flyers to a tiny kiosk, Clovis administrators tried to ensure that YAF鈥檚 opinions would never reach the rest of campus,鈥 said 蜜桃社 attorney Jeff Zeman. 鈥淏ut 蜜桃社鈥檚 here to amplify the voices that censors try to silence and make sure that all Clovis students are heard.鈥

Public colleges like Clovis are bound by the First Amendment, and it is unconstitutional to treat student groups differently based on their viewpoints. Clovis鈥 vague policy banning 鈥渋nappropriate鈥 or 鈥渙ffense [sic]鈥 themes 鈥 terms that could apply to just about anything 鈥 puts protected expression in jeopardy by allowing administrators to arbitrarily decide which opinions are inappropriate or offensive and which deserve to be heard.

鈥淔ree speech is under attack on campuses across the nation, and the recent improper action by Clovis Community College constitutes yet another disappointing example,鈥 said Young America鈥檚 Foundation President Gov. Scott Walker. 鈥淏y attempting to stifle the speech of the conservative students in our Young Americans for Freedom chapter, Clovis administrators engaged in unlawful censorship in violation of the First Amendment.鈥

Today鈥檚 lawsuit is against the college president and three other administrators in their personal and official capacities. By suing these defendants as individuals, not just in their official capacities as Clovis administrators, 蜜桃社 and the YAF students not only seek to change the college鈥檚 unconstitutional policy and end its practice of censoring students based on viewpoint, but to hold college officials personally accountable for violating students鈥 clearly established free speech rights. 

鈥淐lovis鈥 policy and its application are illegal, and 蜜桃社 won鈥檛 let them get away with it,鈥 said 蜜桃社 attorney Gabe Walters. 鈥淐lovis admins 鈥榞ladly鈥 removed posters they found offensive, and we鈥檙e gladly suing them to protect Alejandro, Juliette, and Daniel鈥檚 rights 鈥 and those of all students.鈥

The lawsuit was filed by 蜜桃社 with Daniel Ortner serving as local counsel.

The 蜜桃社 (FIRE) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of all Americans to free speech and free thought 鈥 the most essential qualities of liberty. 蜜桃社 recognizes that colleges and universities play a vital role in preserving free thought within a free society. To this end, we place a special emphasis on defending the individual rights of students and faculty members on our nation鈥檚 campuses, including freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience.

If your First Amendment rights are threatened, contact 蜜桃社: /alarm

CONTACT:

Katie Kortepeter, Media Relations Manager, 蜜桃社: 215-717-3473; media@thefire.org

Recent Articles

FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share